Why do more?

topic posted Thu, October 2, 2003 - 10:03 PM by  Unsubscribed
A general question for this tribe: there vast quantity of music in the world. I want to say, really a quantity of music. If you remove your personal ego-ness and satisfaction in a way or other not very private and personal, why would you be interested to add your sounds, for a partial healthy world, which is already full with music and of the noises crammed?

envoy
posted by:
Unsubscribed
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: Why do more?

    Thu, October 2, 2003 - 11:19 PM
    Is there anything wrong with writing music for personal reasons? I like to write music because I enjoy doing so. Some people like to listen to some of it too, others don't care for it.

    Is the world so "crammed" "full" of art that no more is needed? Is art some sort of commodity that there can be too much of?

    As it is, I don't think there is enough music or art that I care for. Most of what I hear and see is too slick or too commercial or too cloying or too anonymous.

    I do think there is too much chat in the world -- too much meaningless noise. Too many people shouting just to be heard and not because they have anything to say.

    But even so, it's none of my business. I would assume that the chatters enjoy chatting just as much as I enjoy writing music.
    • Re: Why do more?

      Tue, September 14, 2004 - 10:34 AM
      x.j. this may come a little too late but i recieved your cd and it was amazing...really vastly deep and stimulating...its always nice to hear that couples can compose too....check out jujunamjai.net for my stuff i would be happy to send you the compilation when its finished....

      big sonar kiss
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: Why do more?

        Tue, September 14, 2004 - 12:03 PM
        Thanks much Juju! I'm really glad you liked it.

        I had wondered where you'd gotten to and if the CD had arrived.

        Yes, would love to get the compilation.

        The color design on your site is great. Downloading some songs now, but it'll take a while on rural dialup.
  • Re: Why do more?

    Sat, October 4, 2003 - 12:00 AM
    X.J. covered the "why not" personal side of things.

    From the angle of society, communities, tribes, etc. reality can be defined through shared perspectives. Leaving or offering a musical artifact can support, redefine, or create a new perspective.

    Some people just communicate better through the music they create.
    • Unsu...
       

      Expression vs Denial

      Sat, October 4, 2003 - 11:53 AM
      I agree with you on the issue of reality defined by communication.

      I was mainly questioning the idea of excluding "personal" reasons from being valid reasons to create, and questioning the use of the loaded term 'selfish' in conjunction with 'personal'.

      Following this premise, one could then say that communication with others is selfish because it serves the individuals need to communicate with others. With the connotation that 'selfish' is 'bad', and the labelling of communication as intrinsically selfish and thus bad, we are left with people remaining silent at all times, living in caves, or isolating themselves completely from society in some way, as the apparent virtuous path. At that point of Reductio Ad Absurdum, one can see there must be some flaw in the reasoning process. Perhaps then 'selfish' is not the right term to use.

      I hadn't intended to catalogue all my reasons, but was just saying that personal reasons are not bad things because they are personal. I believe that the world benefits when a person's mental, emotional and spiritual well-being are improved through their participation in music or other artistic/creative endeavors. Things that truly benefit individuals almost always benefit society as well and thus the issue of the selfish individual vs the munificent society are not so separable. Of course all acts that improve the world tend to be done by individuals anyway. Thoreau said "A corporation has no conscience". I agree with him and observe that 'groupthink' and the behaviour of mobs tell you much about the virtue of groups vs individuals. Who is this society that benefits? Where is this 'world in general'? They are illusions. Your communication is with other individuals, not with some fictional group that benefits from the unselfishness of individuals. I have never seen a healthy 'group', though I have seen many psychotic groups. Among individuals, there are healthy and unhealthy individuals. Groups serve to dehumanize individuals, which is a bad thing that leads to brutality and mass-delusion.

      I think this issue of the artistic/expressive acts of the individual benefiting many others is true even in the extreme cases, where the music can serve a cathartic (ahem) purpose in both the creator and the listener -- I'll put out Eminem as a case in point. Rather than toke up on a Zoloft Columbine Cocktail and go nuts shooting his percieved enemies with a machine gun, Eminem doesn't hold back and describes his world the way it is. This is a huge change from people who are merely acting tough while being stupid and from others who just want it all to go away and think that the solution to the world's ills is to deny it all, shut the heck up, pop some Prozac and listen to the "Sound of 1000 Strings Playing the World's Most Beautiful Melodies". After listening to the sociologists and handwringers in Group 2, any kid who isn't brainwashed would wonder if he/she is going insane. But then they hear some Eminem, where he tells the truth about how the world is and the kids think, "Dang, someone finally who isn't talking a bunch of BS." It's art which a kid whose uncle or stepfather raped them while their mother was a drug addict and prostitute (both common occurances among today's middle class) can relate to, in contrast to the 'helpful' people who think the solution is for the kid to shut up about it and take some more pills and learn a trade that pays well and requires little creative thinking, which is the preferred solution advocated by the brain-shrinkers, 'counselers' and PTA set. Screaming, pouring your emotion into your art and telling the truth are FAR more effective than the SUPPRESSION and lies advocated by the brain-disablers and deniers.

      I have a friend who was raped by her father at a young age. For many years and at a cost of many hundreds of thousands of dollars, she say dozens of therapists, counselors and others who told her she had to forgive and move on, to get over herself. She was chastised everytime she said she hated her father and wanted him dead. Very similar to the criticism and complaints about what Eminem's said about his mother. During this time, this poor young woman was given happy pills, survived a number of suicide attempts and was in and out of insane asylums. Finally, she talked to a psychologist who told her that it was OK to hate her father and wish him dead. That's all it took -- years of pain washed away like rocks in a New Mexico ravine during a sudden summer thunderstorm. Her mental problems were only that society kept telling her to deny her pain rather than acknowledge it. Once she had permission to tell the truth to someone who would listen, she went on to live a productive and successful life. She asked her psychologist why dozens of professionals had tried to keep her drugged up and in denial for so many years and he said that his years in the industry had convinced him beyond all doubt that 'therapy' was a money making racket run by sadistic lunatics desiring to make the world as insane as their demented selves .

      The truth is healthy. Denial is lies. Lies are unhealthy.

      --

      One of the main reason's I have always written music is indeed selfish -- I get physically sick if I do not.
      • Re: Expression vs Denial

        Fri, June 18, 2004 - 2:32 PM
        i honestly write music to continue a thread of thought that has existed in musical history. I do not feel that the consequence of certain composers has reached their completion. I mean very specifically the mathematical thought of Bach and Coltrane (and a few others, to a lesser extent). There has been such an explosion of music in the 20th century, not only avant-garde, but pop music, jazz, electronic music; and, even better, ethnomusicology has brought the musics of vastly different cultures to my ears. To not find and define a new paradigm of beauty and order in all of this wonderful chaos would be lazy and apathetic.

        i'm sure this is patently egotistical. I don't care. What I have always searched for in music is vastly under-represented, yet hinted at in a variety of musics. The polymeter in west african drumming and indonesian gamelan, the fugues of bach, the harmonic/permutative cycling of coltrane, the psychedlic music of squarepusher, i want to incorporate all of these things into music which is enjoyable and understandable.
        • Re: Expression vs Denial

          Sun, August 15, 2004 - 8:40 PM
          Music is an expression of infinity. There's always more to dive into. Period!

          The same question about too much music can be asked about ANY human activity. Why eat again tomorrow when we've been eating since life evolved the ability to consume energy in this manner? Why exist? Why do anything when everything's been done?

          Truely experiencing the notion of "Being Alive" means fully engaging the primal, original creative spark that started, continues and gives meaning to the act of existing.

          The day we STOP facing the truth and no more primal, original music is produced (which looks KINDA like today, but it's still around if you look deeply in all corners of the world), THAT'S the day that a deep examination of the kind you are starting here is required... but towards the opposite end.
  • Re: Why do more?

    Tue, April 12, 2005 - 3:10 PM
    This reminds me of the old saw: "Why bother to go to all the trouble of writing a novel when you can go to the corner store and buy one for a few dollars?"

    I think the answer to your question is that one has to create. "If you remove your personal ego-ness and satisfaction" you would be removing yourself, since ego is the sense of the self, and one would be creating for one's own satisfaction.

    Rodan

Recent topics in "Microtonal Music"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Bali Artwit 1 April 15, 2008
come join the new WEIRD GUITAR TRIBE at tribe.net 0 March 28, 2008
XENAKIS UPIC style program free.....HighC Ŧ¥ 2 March 3, 2008
some suggestions James 0 March 12, 2007